In an order by Judge Marcia Krieger, the homeowners in a recent construction defect case caught a lucky break.  By way of background, Mark A. and Mark L. Hildebrand were the plaintiffs in a construction defect lawsuit against their builder, New Vista, and one of its principals, Richard Reeves.  The claims against Mr. Reeves were dismissed by a motion for a directed verdict during trial.  Thereafter, the jury found in favor of the Hildebrands and against New Vista, and the trial court entered judgment against New Vista in the amount of $540,000.

The Hildebrands then instituted a declaratory relief action in Jefferson County District Court against National Fire, New Vista, and Mr. Reeves seeking 1) a declaration that National Fire was obligated to pay the jugement and 2) damages against National Fire for breach of contract for failing to pay the judgment in a timely fashion.  In April 2009, National Fire removed the action to the United States District Court of the District Court of Colorado. 

The purpose of this removal was probably because National Fire thought it would get a better outcome in U.S. District Court than in Jefferson County District Court.  As luck would have it, the Hildebrand case was assigned to Judge Krieger, the same judge who issued an order finding no coverage for construction defects in the Greystone v. National Fire case.  The only problem with National Fire’s strategy was that in order to properly remove the case to federal court, National Fire had to request that the court realign the parties so as to achieve complete diversity between them.

Unfortunately for National Fire, Judge Krieger declined to realign the parties and, therefore, found that the court had no subject matter jurisdiction based on diversity.  Because the court had no jurisdiction to hear the case, Judge Krieger remanded the case back to the Jefferson County District Court.  Unfortunately for the Hildebrands, Judge Krieger declined to award costs and attorneys fees associated with the remand.  It will be interesting to see how this issue shakes out in the state court system. 

If you would like to obtain a copy of the Hildebrand order, please contact David M. McLain by phone at (303) 987-9813 or by e-mail at mclain@hhmrlaw.com.  For a more full explanation of construction law in Colorado please visit our website or request a copy of our Overview of Construction Defect Litigation in Colorado.

Recent Posts

Coverage Confusion: When Your Insurance Broker Gets It Wrong

In the intricate world of construction, builders often rely heavily on insurance brokers to secure…

14 hours ago

The “Colorado American Dream Act:” H.B. 25-1272’s Construction Defect Reforms

On March 28, 2025, the Colorado House passed House Bill 25-1272 on second reading with…

3 weeks ago

Navigating Construction Defect Claims and Statutes of Limitation: Key Lessons from Stoecklein v. Fayette Farms

In the recent Colorado Court of Appeals decision Stoecklein v. Fayette Farms, LLC (2024 WL…

1 month ago

Colorado Senate Bill 25-157: A Gift to Plaintiffs’ Attorneys That Will Cost Colorado Businesses and Homebuyers

Over the years, plaintiff’s attorneys have steadily attempted to chip away at the guardrails that…

1 month ago

Colorado Senate Bill 25-185: Preserving Homeowners’ Rights to Assert Negligence Claims Against Subcontractors and Design Professionals

For years, Colorado’s economic loss rule has not applied to residential construction and has not…

1 month ago

Colorado House Bill 25-1261 Will Skyrocket Housing Costs — Here’s Why You Should Oppose It

Colorado lawmakers have introduced House Bill 25-1261, a measure that, while ostensibly aimed at protecting…

2 months ago