Whether the court of appeals erred by holding as a matter of first impression that Colorado’s Common Interest Ownership Act (“CCIOA”) permits a developer-declarant to reserve the power to veto unit owner votes to amend common interest community declarations.
Whether the court of appeals erred in holding that Colorado’s Consumer Protection Act (“CCPA”) claims are subject to pre-dispute mandatory arbitration provisions where this Court previously held, “We leave open the question of whether CCPA claims might be deemed non-arbitrable,” Ingold v. AIMCO/Bluffs, LLC Apartments, 159 P.3d 116, 122 n.5 (Colo. 2007).
In the intricate world of construction, builders often rely heavily on insurance brokers to secure…
On March 28, 2025, the Colorado House passed House Bill 25-1272 on second reading with…
In the recent Colorado Court of Appeals decision Stoecklein v. Fayette Farms, LLC (2024 WL…
Over the years, plaintiff’s attorneys have steadily attempted to chip away at the guardrails that…
For years, Colorado’s economic loss rule has not applied to residential construction and has not…
Colorado lawmakers have introduced House Bill 25-1261, a measure that, while ostensibly aimed at protecting…
