This blog recently ran an entry analyzing the Colorado Supreme Court’s proposed new set of civil procedure rules under the name Civil Access Pilot Project (CAPP). In that entry, besides dissecting certain concerns the new rules raise, this blog gave its readers information regarding the dates for both written and verbal comments to be raised at the public hearing. This short entry is meant as an update following those comments heard by the Colorado Supreme Court.

Following the first round of public comments, the Colorado Supreme Court will form a committee to review the proposed rules and possibly revise the pilot rules. The committee will review the comments and concerns raised by the public hearing and formulate recommendations regarding CAPP for the Court. Following such a review the final version will be submitted once again for public comment, after which the Court will make its final decision regarding implementation of CAPP.

The group being asked to review the comments and proposed rules will be coordinated by Justice Rice. The group is projected to include members of the original pilot proposal group, members of the civil rules committee, representatives from Bar practice groups, members from legislative branch, and other non-lawyer representatives, including doctors and court reporters.

The Court projects the review to conclude sometime in the spring with the public hearing to follow shortly after. Once more concrete dates are given and or there are any more updates to be reported, this blog will provide you with all the information it has available, keeping you apprised of the situation.
For additional information regarding Colorado construction litigation, please contact David M. McLain at (303) 987-9813 or by e-mail at mclain@hhmrlaw.com.

Recent Posts

BKV Barnett, LLC v. Electric Drilling Technologies, LLC: Analyzing the Impact of Colorado’s Anti-Indemnification Statute

In the recent case of BKV Barnett, LLC v. Electric Drilling Technologies, LLC, the United…

1 week ago

Understanding Insurance Disputes in Construction Defect Litigation: A Review of Acuity v. Kinsale

Construction projects are inherently complex, and insurance coverage plays a crucial role in managing risks,…

1 week ago

Flushing Away Liability: What the Aqua Engineering Case Means for Contractors and Subcontractors

The recent Town of Mancos v. Aqua Engineering case is an insightful example of how…

2 months ago

Celebrating Dave McLain’s Recognition in the Best Lawyers in America® 2025

We are thrilled to announce that David M. McLain, a founding partner of Higgins, Hopkins,…

4 months ago

Colorado Court of Appeals’ Ruling Highlights Dangers of Excessive Public Works Claims

In the case of Ralph L. Wadsworth Construction Company, LLC v. Regional Rail Partners (2024…

4 months ago