I received today a communication from the Colorado Association of Home Builders regarding the background and benefits of Senate Bill 13-052. Please take a moment to read this information.

Please Support Senate Bill 13-52
Supporting Transit-Oriented Development and Multi-Family Housing
Background:
  • Affordable housing and transit-oriented, mixed-use developments—or TODs—are facing a crisis of scarcity in Colorado—especially in the Denver metro area.
                                                 
  • Since 2007—when the General Assembly opened mixed-use developments to a host of legal attacks—the percentage of owner-occupied, multi-family units built in the Denver metro area has declined from 25 percent of all units built to 2 percent. With the increased risk of litigation, developers have clearly avoided construction of new multi-family developments.
  • Lack of construction of owner-occupied, mixed-use development denies consumers the most affordable housing product available and denies those interested in easy access to mass transit the opportunity of owning units near light-rail stations.
  • Multi-family developments fit well with current urban-planning trends, and the Denver metro area may be one of the best examples of this across the nation.
  • RTD’s FasTracks is relying on TODs as a key component of the project’s development, future ridership and financial projections.
SB13-52, the Transit-oriented Development Claims Act of 2013:
    • Establishes a right to repair for construction professionals that receive a notice of claim for a construction defect in a TOD

    • Creates a binding arbitration requirement for claims against construction professionals with respect to TODs and makes construction professionals immune for environmental conditions including  noise,  odors,  light, temperatures,  humidity,  vibrations,  and  smoke  or  fumes related to transit, commercial, public and/or retail use

    • Clarifies the statute of repose for the 6-year statute of limitations for actions against architects, contractors, builders, builder vendors, engineers or inspectors involved in improvements to real property

Who Supports of SB-52?


  • Associated General Contractors of Colorado
  • Colorado Association of Home Builders
  • C3, the Colorado Competitive Council
  • Colorado Concern
  • Colorado Contractors Association
  • Denver Metro Chamber of Commerce
  • Mayor Bob Murphy, Lakewood
  • Mayor Marc Williams, Arvada
  • Mayor Heidi Williams, Thornton
  • Mechanical & Plumbing Contractors of Colorado
  • NAIOP Colorado

Recent Posts

Flushing Away Liability: What the Aqua Engineering Case Means for Contractors and Subcontractors

The recent Town of Mancos v. Aqua Engineering case is an insightful example of how…

1 month ago

Celebrating Dave McLain’s Recognition in the Best Lawyers in America® 2025

We are thrilled to announce that David M. McLain, a founding partner of Higgins, Hopkins,…

3 months ago

Colorado Court of Appeals’ Ruling Highlights Dangers of Excessive Public Works Claims

In the case of Ralph L. Wadsworth Construction Company, LLC v. Regional Rail Partners (2024…

3 months ago

Protecting Expert Opinions: Lessons Regarding Attorney-Client Privilege and Expert Retention in Construction Litigation

The Hill Hotel Owner LLC v. Hanover Insurance Company case has garnered attention due to…

3 months ago

Real Case, Real Lessons: Understanding Builders’ Risk Insurance Limits

In the recent case of 5333 Mattress King LLC v. Hanover Insurance Company, the United…

3 months ago